mouse recombinant soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 Search Results


serum tnfr1  (Boster Bio)
94
Boster Bio serum tnfr1
Comparison of serum <t>TNFR1</t> and TNFR2 levels across study groups. Serum concentrations of (A) TNFR1 and (B) TNFR2 were measured by ELISA in HC (n=100), T2DM patients with NA (n=135), and T2DM patients with MA (n=123). Individual data points are shown, with horizontal lines representing the mean ± SD. Differences among the three groups were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction. In subplot A, while TNFR1 levels showed an increasing trend in the NA group, the difference compared to HC was not statistically significant ( p = 0.068). In subplot B, TNFR2 was significantly elevated even in the NA stage compared to HC. HC, healthy controls; NA, normoalbuminuria; MA, microalbuminuria; TNFR1, tumor necrosis factor receptor 1; TNFR2, tumor necrosis factor receptor 2. Significance: **** p < 0.001.
Serum Tnfr1, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+recombinant+soluble+tumor+necrosis+factor+receptor+1/TNFR+Tumor+Necrosis+Factor+Receptor+Mouse+Recombinant+Protein/pmc12875942-77-0-15
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
serum tnfr1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Comparison of serum TNFR1 and TNFR2 levels across study groups. Serum concentrations of (A) TNFR1 and (B) TNFR2 were measured by ELISA in HC (n=100), T2DM patients with NA (n=135), and T2DM patients with MA (n=123). Individual data points are shown, with horizontal lines representing the mean ± SD. Differences among the three groups were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction. In subplot A, while TNFR1 levels showed an increasing trend in the NA group, the difference compared to HC was not statistically significant ( p = 0.068). In subplot B, TNFR2 was significantly elevated even in the NA stage compared to HC. HC, healthy controls; NA, normoalbuminuria; MA, microalbuminuria; TNFR1, tumor necrosis factor receptor 1; TNFR2, tumor necrosis factor receptor 2. Significance: **** p < 0.001.

Journal: Frontiers in Endocrinology

Article Title: Low HDL cholesterol is associated with elevated TNFR1 and TNFR2 levels in early diabetic kidney disease

doi: 10.3389/fendo.2026.1716843

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of serum TNFR1 and TNFR2 levels across study groups. Serum concentrations of (A) TNFR1 and (B) TNFR2 were measured by ELISA in HC (n=100), T2DM patients with NA (n=135), and T2DM patients with MA (n=123). Individual data points are shown, with horizontal lines representing the mean ± SD. Differences among the three groups were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction. In subplot A, while TNFR1 levels showed an increasing trend in the NA group, the difference compared to HC was not statistically significant ( p = 0.068). In subplot B, TNFR2 was significantly elevated even in the NA stage compared to HC. HC, healthy controls; NA, normoalbuminuria; MA, microalbuminuria; TNFR1, tumor necrosis factor receptor 1; TNFR2, tumor necrosis factor receptor 2. Significance: **** p < 0.001.

Article Snippet: Serum TNFR1 and TNFR2 levels were measured using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Wuhan Boster Biological Engineering, Wuhan, China).

Techniques: Comparison, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay